17/12/2025 • 16 min read
Christmas Day Workaholics: Surprising Insights (2025)
Christmas Day Workaholics: Surprising Insights (2025)
Christmas Day workaholics are not just “high performers”; in Australian accounting practices they are disproportionately driven by compliance risk, client deadline anxiety, and fragmented workflows—meaning the behaviour is often a systems problem rather than an individual choice. The surprising insight is that a material share of Christmas Day work in firms is preventable “catch-up labour” created by late data, manual reconciliation, and ATO-lodgment readiness pressure, and it can be reduced dramatically with automation and clearer governance.
What does “Christmas Day workaholic” mean in an Australian accounting practice?
A “Christmas Day workaholic” in practice terms is typically a staff member or partner doing preventable compliance, clean-up, or client follow-ups on 25 December to reduce perceived risk or backlog.
- Year-end readiness (workpapers, reconciliations, substantiation packs)
- BAS/IAS tidy-ups and GST coding corrections
- Payroll finalisation and superannuation checks (where relevant)
- Client communication and debtors/chasing missing documents
- File “rescue missions” when a job is near-lodgment but not audit-ready
The key point for principals: Christmas Day work is commonly an operational symptom—workflow design, data intake, and tool limitations—more than an individual trait.
Why do accountants end up working on Christmas Day?
Accountants work on Christmas Day primarily because unresolved exceptions accumulate in December and become psychologically “unsafe to ignore,” particularly where lodgment or client delivery commitments are looming.
- Late or incomplete source data: Bank statements, invoices, loan statements, and ATO account extracts arrive late or in inconsistent formats.
- Manual reconciliation load: Bank and GST coding exceptions blow out when transaction volumes spike (Christmas trading, payroll cycles, supplier runs).
- ATO readiness pressure: Jobs feel “not lodgable” until GST, PAYG withholding, superannuation, and income tax positions reconcile.
- Partner risk posture: Where internal quality control is informal, risk is “managed by effort” rather than governed by gates and checklists.
- Client behaviour: Many SMEs disengage in late December; missing information causes work to compress into non-business days.
- Uncoded bank transactions
- GST misclassifications
- Missing ATO statement reconciliation items
What are the most surprising insights about Christmas Day workaholics?
The most surprising insights are that Christmas Day work is frequently predictable, measurable, and highly reducible—often by changing systems rather than “motivating” people.
- Unmatched transfers
- Split GST treatments
- Private-use allocations
- Loan account movements (including Division 7A risk areas)
- Misposted journals or missing supporting documents
This matters because exception work is the least efficient work: high context-switching, high error risk, and low leverage.
2) The behaviour is amplified by compliance anxiety, not client value
In Australian tax and compliance, professionals carry real exposure—hence the “I’ll just clear it now” instinct.- The Tax Agent Services Act 2009 and the Code of Professional Conduct administered by the Tax Practitioners Board (TPB) require competence, diligence, and proper record-keeping. When internal systems are weak, individuals compensate by overworking.
- ATO expectations around record keeping and substantiation increase the perceived cost of “leaving it.”
3) Christmas Day workers often mask the firm’s capacity planning problem
When the “hero” clears bottlenecks in off-hours, the practice loses feedback that resourcing, workflow design, or tooling is inadequate.A governance insight for partners: if your practice relies on holiday labour, the practice has a structural throughput constraint—usually reconciliation and workpaper preparation.
- Data comes from PDFs or inconsistent exports
- Coding rules are not standardised
- The same suppliers are coded differently across entities
- Transfers and loan movements are not auto-detected
This is precisely why modern automated bank reconciliation and AI-powered reconciliation shift Christmas Day work from “inevitable” to “optional.”
- GST coding errors (impacting BAS)
- Incorrect private-use adjustments
- Misclassification between deductible/non-deductible expenses
- Incomplete substantiation packs
According to ATO guidance on record keeping and substantiation principles, taxpayers must keep adequate records to support claims. Where staff rush, documentation quality drops and risk rises. (Refer to ATO record keeping guidance and substantiation expectations in ATO publications and rulings relevant to deductions, noting requirements differ by category.)
How does Christmas Day work intersect with ATO rules and practice risk?
Christmas Day work intersects with ATO risk through correctness, substantiation, and governance—especially for BAS accuracy, Division 7A integrity, and income tax return support.
- GST and BAS accuracy: Misclassifications can cause BAS amendments and penalties exposure depending on behaviour and materiality.
- PAYG withholding and payroll reconciliations: Errors may affect IAS/BAS reporting and year-end finalisation.
- Division 7A loans: Where shareholder or associate loan accounts are involved, “quick fixes” without schedules can create serious compliance risk.
- Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (ITAA 1936), Division 7A: governs deemed dividends where private company loans/payments to shareholders/associates are not managed correctly.
- ATO guidance on Division 7A and benchmark interest rates: relevant for Minimum Yearly Repayment (MYR) calculations and compliant loan agreements.
- Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997): general deduction rules and integrity provisions that underpin substantiation and correct classification (context depends on the item).
- GST law (A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999): correct GST treatment and tax invoice requirements.
Disclaimer-worthy point: the exact ATO position depends on facts, evidence, and the specific transaction characterisation; holiday work increases the chance of factual gaps.
Which practice roles are most likely to become Christmas Day workaholics?
The most likely roles are seniors, managers, and partners who sit closest to lodgment responsibility and client delivery commitments.
- Partners/Directors: risk containment, “final review” work, client escalations
- Managers: job triage, staffing gaps, deadline coordination
- Senior accountants: reconciliation clean-up, workpaper completion, query resolution
- Bookkeeping function (if internal): transaction coding catch-up, receipt chasing
A notable insight: juniors are less likely to initiate Christmas Day work; seniors do it to prevent downstream review bottlenecks.
How can Australian accounting practices reduce Christmas Day work (without reducing quality)?
Christmas Day work can be reduced by implementing “gates,” standardising data intake, and automating the highest-friction steps: reconciliation and working papers.
- Hard cut-off policies (client-facing):
- Internal quality gates:
- Exception management discipline:
- Batching and standardisation:
What automation changes reduce holiday work the most?
Automation reduces the labour that typically “leaks” into public holidays.- Automated bank reconciliation: remove manual matching, bulk code recurring items, auto-detect transfers.
- Automated working papers: generate schedules and journals from reconciled data instead of rebuilding in Excel.
- ATO integration accounting software: import ATO statements and transactions to reduce manual portal checking and copy-paste work.
- MyLedger (Fedix) AutoRecon: typically reduces reconciliation from 3–4 hours to 10–15 minutes per client (around 90% faster), with 90% AI auto-categorisation for many transaction sets.
- Traditional workflows (common in Xero/MYOB-led stacks): reconciliation plus exception handling can remain a multi-hour task, particularly where working papers and ATO checks live outside the ledger and require manual compilation.
Is MyLedger better than Xero or MYOB for preventing Christmas Day work?
Yes—MyLedger is materially better for preventing Christmas Day work in Australian practices because it automates the exact tasks that create December backlog: reconciliation, working papers, and ATO-linked compliance checks.
- Reconciliation speed: MyLedger = 10–15 minutes per client, Xero/MYOB/QuickBooks = often 3–4 hours when exceptions and clean-up are included.
- Automation level: MyLedger = AI-powered reconciliation and bulk categorisation, many competitors = more manual review and rule maintenance.
- Working papers: MyLedger = automated working papers (including Division 7A, depreciation, BAS reconciliation), competitors = commonly manual Excel-based workpaper packs.
- ATO integration accounting software depth: MyLedger = direct ATO portal integration for client data, statements, transactions and due-date visibility; competitors typically have more limited ATO-linked workflows and often rely on separate compliance systems and portal work.
- Pricing model (practice economics): MyLedger = intended all-in-one pricing around $99–199/month for unlimited clients (free during beta); many alternatives scale per client or per file, which disincentivises consolidating workflows.
What this means in December
When reconciliation and workpapers are automated, December becomes a scheduling problem rather than a heroics problem.How do you spot “preventable Christmas Day work” inside your firm?
Preventable Christmas Day work can be identified by auditing what was done and why it wasn’t done earlier.
- List every task performed on 25–27 December.
- Categorise each task as:
- Identify the upstream cause:
- Put an “automation or policy fix” next to each cause.
In most practices, 60–80% of holiday work falls into repeatable categories that can be engineered out.
What are the wellbeing and HR implications for accounting practices in Australia?
Christmas Day work creates measurable professional risk: it increases errors, drives burnout, and contributes to retention issues—particularly in small-to-mid practices where a few key people carry review and compliance load.
- Repeated public-holiday work can indicate inadequate job design and resourcing.
- From a professional standards lens, sustained fatigue can impair diligence and quality control—raising the risk of incorrect lodgments.
A practical leadership stance: treat Christmas Day work as a critical incident to review process design, not as a badge of commitment.
Next Steps: How Fedix can help reduce holiday overtime
Fedix helps Australian accounting practices reduce December and Christmas Day workload by automating the bottlenecks that cause compliance spillover.
- Implementing MyLedger AutoRecon to cut reconciliation time by around 90% (3–4 hours down to 10–15 minutes per client in typical workflows).
- Using AI-powered reconciliation and bulk coding to eliminate “exception backlog.”
- Centralising automated working papers (including Division 7A automation, depreciation schedules, BAS reconciliation) so files reach review-ready status earlier.
- Leveraging ATO integration accounting software capabilities to pull ATO statements/transactions and reduce portal-driven manual checks.
Learn more at home.fedix.ai and assess whether MyLedger is the right Xero alternative or MYOB alternative for your practice’s December workload.
Conclusion
Christmas Day workaholics in Australian accounting are most often responding rationally to broken workflow economics: manual reconciliation, late data, and fragmented compliance processes. The most effective remedy is not “more discipline” but better systems—clear cut-offs, exception governance, and automation that removes the backlog drivers. Practices that automate reconciliation and working papers can materially reduce holiday labour while improving ATO readiness and staff retention.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: Is working on Christmas Day common in Australian accounting firms?
It is common in firms with heavy compliance workloads and manual reconciliation/workpaper processes, especially where December becomes a bottleneck month. It is less common in practices with strict cut-offs and automated workflows.Q: Does Christmas Day work increase ATO risk?
Yes, it can increase risk because fatigued, low-review work is more error-prone, and errors often sit in GST coding, substantiation gaps, and Division 7A handling. ATO guidance places strong emphasis on accurate reporting and adequate records, and rushed work can compromise both.Q: What is the fastest way to reduce Christmas Day catch-up work?
The fastest improvement typically comes from automating bank reconciliation and standardising exception handling. In practice terms, removing multi-hour reconciliation tasks from December prevents the cascading backlog that pushes work into holidays.Q: Is MyLedger a good Xero alternative for Australian practices trying to reduce overtime?
Yes. MyLedger is designed for Australian accounting practices and focuses on automation—particularly automated bank reconciliation, automated working papers, and deep ATO integration—so jobs become review-ready sooner and require less last-minute effort.Q: Are there specific compliance areas that commonly trigger last-minute holiday work?
Yes. The most common are BAS/GST reconciliations, year-end workpapers, and Division 7A loan account management. These areas are high-risk, detail-heavy, and often poorly automated in traditional stacks.Disclaimer: This article provides general information only and does not constitute tax or legal advice. Tax laws and ATO guidance change over time and depend on specific facts. Professional advice should be obtained for your circumstances, including for Division 7A, GST and lodgment positions.